Written By David DeBoer *See disclaimer below*
Background
The disease COVID-19 is caused by a coronavirus, SARS CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2). Thirty-three percent of common colds are caused by coronaviruses. The latest evidence indicates that this virus may have been engineered at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, and either deliberately or accidentally released from that lab.
A New Approach
As a response to the virus, a new form of vaccine was created. The COVID shot introduced a new technology – gene therapy using messenger RNA (mRNA). Our bodies naturally produce messenger RNA in the nuclei of our cells; it tells the cell what protein to synthesize.
In this mRNA gene therapy, the mRNA that produces the spike protein found on the surface of the COVID-19 virus, was modified and used in the formulation of the shot. When a person receives the shot, this modified mRNA enters the inoculated person’s cells and tells the cell to produce the spike protein, which then appears on the surface of those cells. In response to the presence of the spike protein, the person’s immune system produces antibodies to attack it. Theoretically, an inoculated person’s immune system would begin attacking the virus if it tried to infect them. As our immune systems normally defend against foreign invaders coming from outside our cells, rather than responding to a foreign protein produced from within the cell, this represented a radically different approach than the traditional vaccine.
Worries About the Vaccine
While there had previously been widespread trust in most vaccines in the US, the specific circumstances surrounding the COVID shot caused many worries and skepticism to arise from the public sphere. Let’s take a second to explore some of these reasons and examine why they have occurred.
How Necessary Is the Shot?
The risk of death from COVID, over the entire population, including those at greatest risk, is less than 1%. If you exclude those at highest risk (the elderly, the obese, those with more than two additional serious health conditions), the fatality rate drops to .2 percent. This means that of 1000 people getting COVID, two will die (by comparison, of 1000 people getting smallpox, which has a 30% fatality rate, 300 will die). Included in this data are all the deaths that the CDC now admits were deaths from other causes, but were listed as COVID deaths because the patient had tested positive for COVID.
Is the Shot Effective?
A vaccine before the age of COVID-19 was understood to be an inoculation that prevented infection; if you got a smallpox vaccine, you would not get smallpox. The COVID-19 shot is not a vaccine in this traditional sense. It does not keep you from getting COVID-19, getting sick from it, being hospitalized, or dying from it.
Our government and medical institutions continue to promote these shots, claiming that although they don’t prevent transmission, infection, hospitalization or death, they result in fewer severe cases overall. However, data shows that states and/or countries with higher inoculation rates do not have fewer COVID cases or deaths than those with lower inoculation rates. This has caused many to be skeptical of the government’s claims.
Safety Concerns
After considering risk of death from COVID, the next consideration is the safety of the COVID shots. Not only did the type of vaccine change, but the process for approval has also changed, leading to a plethora of concerns regarding potential hidden dangers of the shot. The normal approval process for a vaccine includes testing to see if it affects our genes, causes cancer or birth defects, or affects fertility. A typical testing time-period for potential vaccines is eight to ten years. However, due to a push for urgency, testing for the Pfizer, Moderna and J&J shots was shortened to under a year. Pfizer then petitioned the government to place their study data under seal for the next 75 years. This effort was rejected in court, and the data has been made available to the public and also compiled by volunteer experts from various fields into a book called ‘The Pfizer Documents.’
As more information about adverse effects from the COVID mRNA shot comes to light, this new technology is alarming. Rather than staying at the injection site, the mRNA travels throughout the body producing spike protein, which can wreak havoc on multiple organs and systems.
Adverse events reported include myocarditis/pericarditis, heart attacks, Bell’s Palsy, stroke, reproductive disorders, miscarriage, sperm damage, blood clots and neurological disorders.
In addition, two concerns were brought forward by the group American Frontline Doctors when the vaccines were introduced:
1 – Are the vaccines causing antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)?
ADE is when a vaccine prompts the immune system to produce antibodies that are ineffective in fighting the virus, resulting in illness that is worse than it would have been without the vaccine. In effect, the vaccine ends up enhancing the illness by inhibiting the immune system’s natural ability to fight it. Previously studied potential vaccines for coronaviruses showed this tendency, which is why none were ever produced.
2 – Did the vaccines affect human fertility?
No one could answer this question, because the vaccines were approved without the necessary long-term studies. Nevertheless, there were continual assurances from governments and the medical establishment that the vaccines were ‘safe and effective.’
Social Agendas
Perhaps one of the biggest concerns from the public about the Covid-19 Vaccines, is the behavior of social and governmental powers in the wake of their release. Our government, in collusion with social and mainstream media institutions, suppressed any voices raising concerns about the vaccines’ safety and efficacy, or about the WHO and CDC protocols that were put into place. Respected scientists were discredited in smear campaigns, careers and reputations were ruined, and the public was prevented from acquiring information that would have allowed for informed consent.
Perhaps worse still, the government offered financial incentives for hospitals to report COVID cases and deaths, and financial incentives if hospitals followed a protocol for COVID that was known to be ineffective. This protocol included refusing safe and proven therapeutics, giving COVID patients Remdesivir (a drug known to cause organ failure), and putting patients on ventilators, which had been known from the earliest days of the pandemic to be the wrong approach to COVID, often causing rather than preventing death. We will never know what the true COVID fatality rate was in this country. To many this reads as profit-driven care rather than genuine health care, leaving us as the test subjects of this long-term COVID-19 mRNA gene thereapy experiment.
In the end, we must all make our own choices. What’s important is that we do the research, considering all narratives and supporting data before making a conclusion.
Sources
- Lies My Gov’t Told Me by Dr. Robert Malone (inventor of mRNA technology)
- Cause Unknown by Edward Dowd
- War Room/Daily Clout Pfizer Documents Analysis Report by Pfizer Documents Investigations Team, Amy Kelly Project Director. Dr. Naomi Wolf of Dailyclout.io. https://dailyclout.io/category/campaigns/pfizer-documents-analysis/
- America’s Frontline Doctors
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/medical
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/medical/vaccine-information
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/12-facts-you-need-to-know-about-the-vaccine-before-you-decide-to-take-it/ - Dr. Peter McCullough
https://www.petermcculloughmd.com/
https://olivetreeviews.org/radio-archives/the-agenda-2/
Disclaimer:
Any information on this site is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice. The health related and medical information is provided as an information resource only, and is not to be used or relied on for any diagnostic or treatment purposes. This information is not intended to be patient education, does not create any patient-physician, client- nurse practitioner or patient-pharmacist relationship, and should not be used as a substitute for professional diagnosis and treatment. It is recommended the reader of this site consult with a qualified health care provider of their choice when using any information obtained from this site. Any information obtained from this site is left to the discretion and is the sole responsibility of the user of this site. The contributors of this site cannot be held responsible for the information or any inadvertent errors or omissions of the information. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may from time to time be changed or supplemented. If you do not agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, you should not enter this site. The contributors of this site shall have no liability, for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on the information contained in this site.
